P. Louvre E 7856 recto

See more information about P. Louvre E 7856 recto in Trismegistos’ Demotic and Hieratic Texts [TM 69409].

Recommended edition

K. Donker van Heel, ‘Papyrus Louvre E 7856: verso and recto: leasing land in the reign of Taharka’, RdÉ 49 (1998), 91-105.

Transcription

Transcription of P. Louvre 7856 recto in PDF

Transliteration

  1. Ḥꜣ.t-sp 19 ı͗bd-I šmw ꜥrḳy.
  2. ḏd Ḫꜣꜥ=w-sw-n-⸢Mw.t⸣ sꜣ Pn- I͗mn n wꜣḥ-mw R[rı͗ sꜣ]
  3. Wn-nfr ḥnꜥ ⸢Pꜣ⸣-dı͗-I͗mn-m-⸢I͗p⸣ ptr sw ı͗ […]
  4. tꜣ dnı͗.t 1/10 n pr I͗mn ⸢Pꜣ⸣-dı͗-I͗mn-m-⸢I͗p⸣ <sꜣ> Pꜣ-ṯnf ⸢pꜣ⸣ […]
  5. ı͗.dı͗ st n=n ⸢ı͗ wꜥ⸣ 5 dnı͗.t ı͗ ⸢pꜣ⸣ 2 pꜣ 1/10 […].
  6. ı͗.ı͗r nꜣ sẖ(.w) pr-I͗mn ḫꜣ⸢y⸣ pꜣ ꜣḥ ⸢rn⸣(=ı͗)
  7. ı͗w ⸢mn dı͗.t(=ı͗) md⸣ [nb ı͗ ḏd].ṱ⸢=s ı͗rm=k⸣.
  8. Pꜣ mtr-sẖ … [… …].

Translation

  1. Regnal year 19, month I of shemu, last day.
  2. Has said Khauesenmut son of Penamun to the choachyte Re[ry son of]
  3. Wennefer and Peteamunemip: “Look at [… As for (?)]
  4. the 1/10 share of the Domain of Amun, Peteamunemip <son of> Patjenef (is) the one […]
  5. who has given it to us against (each) one (of) 5 a share (?), against the 2 (sacks as (?)) the 1/10 […].
  6. The scribes of the Domain of Amun will measure the field in my name,
  7. whereas I have no issue at all to discuss with you.”
  8. The witness-scribe … [… …].

Notes

Line 2: The reconstruction of the name Rery was done based on the P. Louvre 7856 verso line 3. The traces would also allow a reading with Ḏd or Ḥr.

Line 3: Reading ptr sw by Archidona Ramírez.

Line 4:. Note the close similarity of Pꜣ-ṯnf to the name Pꜣ-mr-mšꜥ  in P. Louvre E 7852 recto line 3 (Archidona Ramírez).

Line 8: The name of the witness-scribe contains at least the elements pn or pꜣ and ı͗wı͗w; see RdE 49 (1998), 101 n. z.

Questions about this manuscript

Question 1:

Can you recognise I͗mn in lines 2 and 3 without checking the transcription first?

Answer to Question 1Check the hieroglyphic transcription.

Question 2:

What seems to be the most characteristic element suggesting that we have to read the season as šmw and not pr.t?

Answer to Question 2In šmw the first vertical stroke of the sign for š at the beginning – which is easily confused with the initial pr sign in pr.t – generally extends below the baseline.

Question 3:

How can you tell that this is the recto of the papyrus?

Answer to Question 3Near the right edge there is a clear sheet-join.

Question 4:

Identify rn ‘name’ in line 6. What makes the determinative different from the same determinative in demotic?

Answer to Question 4In abnormal hieratic the man with hand to mouth determinative is often preceded by either the tusk or the multifunctional sign, which we transcribe as the tusk below two oblique strokes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *